Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

22 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 21	April 23 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Rawanduz Revolt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like all articles created by this editor (see e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rawandiz), this one seems to fabricate pseudohistory from some sources which mention something vaguely related at best, but without any sources about the actual subject. Fram (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Iraq. Fram (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, but I want to clarify that all the sources used in the article do mention that Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz launched a revolt, and they describe it as a successive or multi-phase conflict involving resistance against Ottoman authority. While the event may not always be labeled in English-language sources as the “Rawanduz Revolt,” that does not mean it did not happen or that it lacks historical basis.

This revolt is well known among the Kurdish people and is documented in several academic and regional sources—what may appear “vague” in English sources is more clearly established in local or specialized historical literature. The purpose of the article is not to invent history, but to present events that are verifiable through multiple references, even if the naming conventions differ.

I believe that instead of deletion, the article could benefit from improving the sourcing format, adding inline citations, and possibly clarifying the terminology used, but dismissing it outright undermines a notable episode of Kurdish-Ottoman relations. MHD1234567890 (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mardin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable, from the same editor who gave us Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rawandiz with the same issues.

This is a battle in 1833, but the source doesn't mention 1833 or Mardin[1]. I can't find any evidence for this battle (there was some action around Mardin in this period, but nothing to actually support this specific event). Fram (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I agree that there may be some ambiguity regarding the exact date and the name of the battle. However, the sources I included clearly indicate that Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz captured Mardin from Ottoman control during his western campaign. While the exact year 1833 may not be directly stated in every source, it is a reasonable approximation based on the timeline of his military actions, particularly following his operations in 1832.

The article does not attempt to fabricate an event but rather to document a historical moment that is mentioned briefly in the context of his broader campaign. Given that, I believe the article can be improved with clarification and attribution, rather than deletion. I’m open to revising the title or content to better reflect the source material, such as renaming it to Capture of Mardin (1830s) or merging it into the article on Muhammad Pasha’s military campaigns if that’s more appropriate. MHD1234567890 (talk) 08:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mi.Mu Gloves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant independent, reliable sources that demonstrate notability under Wikipedia's guidelines. Most coverage appears to come from promotional or affiliated sources Xrimonciam (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Products. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Villilä studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for companies or studios. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Finland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it passes WP:ORGDEPTH, but there's quite some news coverage from Finnish media (e.g. Yle). I would suggest searching for "Villilä Studiot". MarioGom (talk) 17:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grits & Eggs (podcast)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any sources on a WP:BEFORE besides social media, no indication that it meets WP:GNG. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Radio, Entertainment, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: could not find any reliable coverage (such as reviews) that would establish notability Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kottikulam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Indian town doesn't really have any notability, other than having a train station in it. Article only really has a name and a non-absolute location (only relative to other areas). Dr. Hyde, muahahaha _{jekyllthefabulous} (speak, or you shall die) 07:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Kerala. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SYSGO

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability guidelines, see specifically WP:NCORP. businesses have no inherent notability and require significant coverage in reliable sources. a WP:BEFORE has failed to find such necessary coverage. note: was previously prodded by me before being deprodded here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PikeOS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability guidelines, see specifically WP:PRODUCT. a WP:BEFORE failed to return significant coverage in reliable sources. note: was previously prodded by me before being deprodded here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah Woh Main

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This song doesn't appear to meet any of the relatively strict criteria of WP:NSONG, there is already some information about this song on her page so I don't think there is reason to merge the page. You can try to convince me of a redirect but I don't think this song is big enough for that to even be considered. Moritoriko (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and India. Moritoriko (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ELinOS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability guidelines, see specifically WP:PRODUCT. a WP:BEFORE failed to return significant coverage in reliable sources. note: was previously prodded by me before being deprodded here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marlo Anderson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears promotional and fails to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG. The subject is mainly known for creating "National Day Calendar," and the references are mostly primary or light news coverage. WikiDogebama (talk) 06:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Radio, Technology, and North Dakota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gia Vicari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for sports and athletics.
This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral.
The major contributor to this article, namely Giavv23 (talk · contribs), appears to have a close connection with its subject. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 06:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Women, Football, Australia, and United States of America. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 06:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arne Watle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of non-notable individual. Has been tagged as potentially failing to meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline since June 2013. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 05:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Transportation, and Norway. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Clearly fails WP:NBIO, and my WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing useful. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 07:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Artem Vasko

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find any WP:SIGCOV on this player in any relevant language. Seems, then, to fail WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 05:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 05:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish ritual baths in Colorado

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NLIST. References are primary, and no sources appear to discuss this specific grouping. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism, Lists, and Colorado. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. None of the mikvahs themselves are notable (they dont even have their own pages in Wikipedia), so why include them in a list? Usually, lists are here on Wikipedia to direct us to articles that fulfill the criteria of the list. It doesn't even do that. Dr. Hyde, muahahaha _{jekyllthefabulous} (speak, or you shall die) 05:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Ajf773 (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Martín Ojeda (footballer, born 1997)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG; I did some searching and was not able to find significant coverage in any reliable source Joeykai (talk) 04:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Argentina. Joeykai (talk) 04:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matt (gamer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. The interviews sourced in the article at present are by reliable sources, but this is arguably routine seasonal coverage. This player did not achieve any significant results during his career; when he was in a tier-one league, his team never made top-three, peaking at fourth place (semifinals). Yue🌙 01:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and United States of America. Yue🌙 01:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only demonstrated notability is joining a tier-one league without significant results so there isn't a lot of information about him that can be documented. So many gamers named Matt around the world and this guy gets to be considered the definitive Matt gamer, if only he had a more significant career. MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:48, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Matt Elento ("Matt") competed in the NA LCS, a fully professional league, and has reliable, independent coverage from ESPN, invenglobal.com, tsn.ca, Polygon, DBLTAP, thenextweb.com etc. Goodboyjj (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I contend, as I did in previous discussions of other LCS players, that the coverage presented is routine and not in-depth. There are around 300 players who have competed in the LCS, most of whom have some routine coverage (e.g. rosters swaps, season interviews) by esports and esports-adjacent outlets. Not all these players deserve an article though; most of have never made it to the top-three, many not even to playoffs, and most have never won individual honours either (e.g. MVP, all-pro team, rookie of the split, etc.)

My argument is therefore:

Yue🌙 16:58, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Bob's Wonderland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable restaurant (formerly a ShowBizz pizza location, now independent) that does not appear to have any SIGCOV outside of local media profiles. nf utvol (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Entertainment, and West Virginia. nf utvol (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: "Local media profiles" appears to be an inaccurate description. Several of the cited sources are news stories, not profiles, and at least two of the news sources are non-local: USA Today is a national news source, and while WOAY-TV is from West Virginia, Oak Hill, West Virginia isn't local—I live just a few miles from the restaurant, though I've never been there, and we've never gotten WOAY in this area; our local ABC affiliate is WCHS-TV. Oak Hill isn't part of the local area; it's more than 90 miles away. The coverage looks like what you would expect for a local attraction, and is more than you'd see for some that meet the minimum standards for notability. The fact that it was once part of a chain—many years ago, apparently—does not make it non-notable as an independently-operated restaurant with a distinctive identity. P Aculeius (talk) 11:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The USA Today article doesn't mention Billy Bob's Wonderland at all. I think the WOAY and WCHS coverage still would fall under local interest stories. The DCist article is the only one that really would satisfy non-local coverage, and I am not sure that passes the reliable sources test. nf utvol (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean about USA Today. Perhaps this could be solved by merging into Showbiz Pizza. The fate of restaurants that "divorced" from the chain but still maintained the basic concepts and show seem relevant, and since the parent article has major sources, there shouldn't be any issue with using local sources to describe the fate of one such restaurant in one or two short paragraphs. If others are documentable, they can be added too, and a section containing them could be trimmed accordingly, but for now I think some of this content could go there. P Aculeius (talk) 03:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vennello Hai Hai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FILM, no reliable reviews in Telugu or English [2] [3]. No evidence that the dubbed version was ever released other than the soundtrack [4]. For context, Ajmal's previous Telugu film as a lead, Prabhanjanam (2014), lacks an article due to lack of reliable sources. Redirect to Avunu Valliddaru Ista Paddaru!#Soundtrack. DareshMohan (talk) 02:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Malladi Venkata Krishna Murthy: (author of the freely adapted work) or to Avunu Valliddaru Ista Paddaru!, or to List of Telugu films of 2016, as WP:ATD, and merge what can be. -Mushy Yank. 08:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Occupancy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a dictionary. Qwirkle (talk) 01:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as DICTDEF. Carrite (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Laun chba ller 02:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: I feel that the article is not entirely a dictionary definition and that there is room for encyclopedic expansion, particularly in the "building codes" section. However, the article in its current state is not well sourced or especially useful. If this is deleted, it should be without prejudice towards a better encyclopedic article on the topic existing in the future. silviaASH (inquire within) 02:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but no prejudice to draftify. When I initially saw the page, I thought that it could be kept. Turned out it is primarily about the word "occupancy" rather than about the concept of occupancy, especially with the section "other meanings". But I think it has the potential to be a better article, it just needs time.

Dr. Hyde, muahahaha _{jekyllthefabulous} (speak, or you shall die) 05:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mehek Cooke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't have enough reliable sources or they are mainly mentions, social media and not deep coverage about the subject. Darkm777 (talk) 00:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. Darkm777 (talk) 00:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, Delhi, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Qaeda guest houses, Faisalabad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following the successful Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Qaeda safe houses, Kabul, nominating related articles that fails the same criteria. Random hodgepodge of references to random locations. Fails WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and utterly lacks focused WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:RS. Longhornsg (talk) 00:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages:[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Terrorism, Pakistan, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 00:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Original research. Much of the sourcing is from the files of the US Department of Defense. User Geo Swan who created these, is permanently banned by the community, from editing the English Wikipedia. — Maile (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Gutman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR per WP:BEFORE. Longhornsg (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, United States of America, and Michigan. Longhornsg (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Law, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is an article about one of her books [5], confirmed on the second reference under the External Links section in the article. I'll keep looking. Oaktree b (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep: This [6] in Kirkus Reviews. I suppose two reviews are enough for AUTHOR. Oaktree b (talk) 00:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Newspapers.com also turns up a number of reviews in American newspapers, e.g. of her first book, Equivocal Death: [7], [8], [9], [10] (2 pages); and the second The Anniversary: [11], [12], , [13], [14], [15], [16]. There's also a few more profile-y articles from around when the books came out that would enable the fleshing out of a true article, namely [17] (two pages, I didn't clip the second), and [18], [19], [20]. Mostly small papers, but all around the country. I think NAUTHOR (and GNG) is met here. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kaluki Paul Mutuku

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon search, subject doesn't seem to be notable as far as reliable, secondary sources. Not to mention, a lot of the sources currently mentioned in the article about the subject are either primary, or seem to be promotional/unreliable sources. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Environment, Africa, and Kenya. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lean Keep: this source seems to be a reliable secondary source but I am not sure how in-depth it is. And it does mention how it is a problem that 'western' media in general are bad at covering climate activists from other parts of the world. Not saying this is a WP:Ignore All Rules moment but worth keeping under consideration. I have never seen the Trice Edney Newswire or Global Information Network before so I don't know how reliable of a source they are, but they give us this. If these can be counted enough for notability then I think we are good. (And they are spread across time too which I think is a bonus) Moritoriko (talk) 07:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]